Walk the Line
Looking on Rotten Tomatoes, I see that Walk the Line has received an 82% fresh rating. Checking last year's biopic Ray, I see it received an 81%. This doesn't surprise me at all, as they are basically the same exact movie; Boring, run of the mill biopics that should be on NBC and not in theaters. What surprises me is why critics keep eating this shit up.
Walk the Line stars Joaquin Phoenix as legendary musician Johnny Cash. The film follows Cash in typical biopic fashion: early childhood tragedy, struggling to make ends meet with a wife and kids, requisite scene where he begs someone to record his music, marital troubles, drug addiction, and big declaration of love. There is also very little artistry to the filmmaking. Everything is told in a bland, straightforward manner, without any visual flair and a noticeable lack of energy.
If one thing makes this film watchable, it is Reese Witherspoon's performance as June Carter. Reese confirms her status as one of the best actresses of her generation with her bright, vividly cheerful, soaring portrait of June. Almost everytime she appears on screen, the entire tone of the film changes and it becomes a joy to watch. But even her performance can't completely overcome the listless script.
It's true that last year I was a little more friendly to Ray. It may be because Ray Charles' death was a little more recent, maybe because Jamie Foxx's performance was a little more deeply felt, but it's most likely my annoyance at seeing the same exact thing in consecutive years. I guess I can't exactly blame the filmmakers. If the critics keep eating it up, and the Oscars keep awarding it, they'll continue to make it.
At the end of the film, there is the traditional scrawl to tell us what happened afterwards. We learn that Johnny Cash and June Carter were married for the next 35 years (until their death), moved into his home in Hendersonville, had a kid, and continued to tour together all over the world. Now, that's the movie I'd like to see.
Walk the Line stars Joaquin Phoenix as legendary musician Johnny Cash. The film follows Cash in typical biopic fashion: early childhood tragedy, struggling to make ends meet with a wife and kids, requisite scene where he begs someone to record his music, marital troubles, drug addiction, and big declaration of love. There is also very little artistry to the filmmaking. Everything is told in a bland, straightforward manner, without any visual flair and a noticeable lack of energy.
If one thing makes this film watchable, it is Reese Witherspoon's performance as June Carter. Reese confirms her status as one of the best actresses of her generation with her bright, vividly cheerful, soaring portrait of June. Almost everytime she appears on screen, the entire tone of the film changes and it becomes a joy to watch. But even her performance can't completely overcome the listless script.
It's true that last year I was a little more friendly to Ray. It may be because Ray Charles' death was a little more recent, maybe because Jamie Foxx's performance was a little more deeply felt, but it's most likely my annoyance at seeing the same exact thing in consecutive years. I guess I can't exactly blame the filmmakers. If the critics keep eating it up, and the Oscars keep awarding it, they'll continue to make it.
At the end of the film, there is the traditional scrawl to tell us what happened afterwards. We learn that Johnny Cash and June Carter were married for the next 35 years (until their death), moved into his home in Hendersonville, had a kid, and continued to tour together all over the world. Now, that's the movie I'd like to see.